The Sizzle or the Steak?

Putting the building blocks of the business into a plan for investors is one of the top teaching methods for an MBA student. I would heartily recommend the gruelling process to any person trying to be top in their field. It is a realistic teaching method that replicates the stress of presenting your business model and future revenue streams to Bay Street financiers, as well as bringing the defeats which build up business resilience. As John Rothschild, Founder of Prime Restaurants said in the evening during his fireside chat to the room of entrepreneurs, "We all get beaten down and scarred, but we all get back up again."

The Ivey Business Plan Competition is the best in the country at attracting top students from the USA and across Canada. Perhaps it could be the $30,000 prize money, or the added benefit of spending a few days with the best and brightest students as they put in the foundation stone of potential new businesses.  

This year, I had my team at Loewen & Partners look at the four business plans and executive summaries to weigh up which plan they thought was the most fundable idea. I like to read the plans beforehand and compare my team's views with my own. Usually the business plan reflects the best idea and it is pretty obvious which plan and team deserves to go to the finals. 

This year was different. 

The most financially exciting business idea had a well written executive summary, but not much information for the investor. If they were trying to attract an Angel investor for seed capital, they were not building a compelling case for me. Yet, the problem was that their IP technology came out of the hugely reputable Waterloo University, and it was immediately fundable. The judges would all know the government would add in grants or loans.

At Ivey, during the judge’s briefing, we went over how to judge who goes to the finals. Was it based on effort and excellence of the plan or was it based on who I would see getting financing. I was told the winner would be the company most likely to attract investment dollars for their concept today in VC world. In other words, the steak over the sizzle must win.

It was heartbreaking to see my top ranked team get bumped by the weakest presentation, despite the relevant PowerPoint and the carefully crafted speeches. If the weak plan had been presented by a team demonstrating true entrepreneurial vigour, I could forgive the lack of financials.  

That was sadly not the case. 

In the end, the weaker team won because their plan was green tech, which we all knew is immediately fundable by VCs. Anyone see a bubble here?

In comparison, the team who’s work I admired, would not attract funding from a Canadian based VC as it was a start up in China. In my book, Money Magnet, I lay out the reasons VCs and Angels say yes to a business investment, and the first rule is it has to be within 3 hours driving time. China clearly does not fit that rule. If only this excellent team had read the chapter on Angel and seed investing in my book. Barring that, if only they were seeking seed money at a MBA competition in China.

There you have it: the steak had to win. 

The sizzle, although it got my mouth watering, was not enough for seed investors. It is not often that I have judge’s remorse, but the competition left me reflecting on how business success is about being in the right industry at the right time.  I have no doubt, that hard working team will benefit from their effort in the real world. Perhaps, in five years time, maybe we will be reflecting on how a business plan competition spawned a Chinese business success story.

Can Canada ever have one market regulator?

I sit on the Board of the Exempt Market Dealers Association which works with the Ontario Securities Commission to develop regulation of the private placement market. The Board has 21 Directors, most of whom are lawyers. Before you groan, I must rush to say that it is a pleasure working with smart, articulate and often wryly amusing worsmiths, because lawyers are wordy.
The Exempt Market Dealers Association is a national body, even though Canada actually has 13 regulators. Apparantly we are the only country in the world with more than one securities commission, and who is our companion country?
Bosnia! Not great company, one could say.
So What is the purpose of the Exempt Market Dealers' Association?

1. To protect investors from unfair, improper, or fraudulent practices; 
2. To foster fair and efficient capital markets and confidence in those markets.

What do you think of these guiding principals?

• facilitating the reduction of systemic risk, including through monitoring of systemic events or developments and cooperation and coordination with other financial authorities; 
• recognizing that the business and regulatory costs and other restrictions on the business and investment activities of market participants should be proportionate to the benefits sought to be realized;
• maintaining the competitive position of Canada’s capital markets, which is desirable as capital markets are international in character; facilitating innovation in Canada’s capital markets; 
• promoting the informed participation of investors in the capital markets to support effective and responsive securities regulation; 
• recognizing regional markets and sectors.

Value Creation is Changing

The capitalist system is under siege, says Michael Porter, Harvard Business School and the originator of the term Competitive Advantage. Porter talks about how business is a popular choice to play the role of the bad guy in Hollywood and how there is a deluge of opinions about it causing societal problems. Business has tried to take on “Social Responsibility” but this openness and good will seems to have opened up more criticism. Private equity, which has saved thousands of jobs and protected the longevity of companies, is also under fire and being questioned.

This declining trust has caused politicians and market regulators to add more rules and policies to cripple the capitalist system. 

As always, business needs to be the first to step forward in a new direction and look for solutions. Already there are signs that business has been the first to recognize, the business model that worked well ten years ago may now be growing swiftly stale.

One such framework to review is the way business views value creation. It is the short time financial focus in a bubble, while missing customer needs and broader societal influences that determine long term success.

Obviously, those companies who are large enough to have the luxury of participating in round tables and what not, and can take the time to influence and brainstorm the issues. 

Yet in Canada, 80% of company owners run smaller businesses and from the ones I see on a daily basis, they are running on whiffs of fumes. For example, plastic bag manufacturers are having to deal with plastic bags manufactured with logo and all in China and shipped at a tiny cost. How can a small Canadian based company making slim profit margins compete? How can the Canadian government demand more from their taxes, paperwork and health and safety regulations while opening up the door to competitive products not burdened with labour law or higher capital costs?

Secret: Build better products

I valued Ben Horowitz talking about Cloud Technology and how to build a good company. He is so truthful about the 3:00am in the morning fearful meltdowns.
Ben says there is no way to build a new company without a transformational product. What is really important is the product, not the business model, the business plan or hiring MBAs. Innovating and coming up with something way better is key. The big firms have a hard time doing innovation.
Here is Andreeson's other half, Ben Horowitz, taking about how to build a good company. A brief list of Ben's points:

1. When a bankrupt Apple got Steve Jobs back as leader, his new strategy was "build a better product" and it worked. 
2. Skills to win the market are then important. Do you take the market and sell your excellent product?
3. Be a good person as CEO. No one wants to work for a CEO who is a jerk.
4. The key ingredient really is leadership, not management. Leadership is the ability to get people to follow you, if only out of curiosity.

Ben Horowitz was a co-founder of Opsware (formerly Loudcloud), which was acquired by HP in 2007. Earlier, he was vice president and general manager of America Onlines E-commerce Platform division, where he oversaw development of the companys flagship business.

Is Govt Backing of PE Funds Unique to China?

Xie Ping, head of China's Private Equity fund, must be unfamiliar with one of Canada's largest and most influential funds such as OTPP, which was involved in some of the biggest deals in the world. Xie said, 

"China’s private equity industry is unique because it’s dominated by the State and will follow a different path from overseas peers." 

Entities that manage private equity in China and those that invest in such funds are primarily State-owned institutions, China Investment Corp’s Xie said in Beijing.

By having government backing, China’s private equity funds can increase the value of Chinese companies in which they invest, the report cited Xie as saying. This is an aspect of the Chinese market that is different from other countries, he added.The ability to invest directly in private equity is currently limited to a few large State-owned institutions such as China’s national pension fund, the report said.

Bloomberg News reported Tuesday, citing Xie Ping, vice-president at the nation’s $300 billion sovereign wealth fund.

How to Boost Sales

US executives are turning to reality television to repair the battered image of corporate America, turning a show, in which bosses work incognito alongside their most poorly-paid employees into the most successful tool for restoring brand images.

Undercover Boss was responsible for seven of the year’s 10 most effective product placements according to Nielsen, the measurement company, which looked at how well audiences recalled the brand and how much the show improved their opinion of it. Nielsen’s data show a trend towards such extended features on a single company rather than the traditional highlighting of brands in programmes such as American Idol.

"In difficult times, people are interested in watching TV programmes where there is some recognition of the difficulties they face,” says Stephen Lambert, the executive producer behind Undercover Boss and Fairy Jobmother, a UK import about getting the unemployed back to work. “At a time of great insecurity people like watching shows where people end up in a better place.”

Undercover Boss typically ends with the executive setting up a health scheme or taskforce, and rewarding employees with scholarships, holidays or, in one case, a 7-Eleven franchise.

Read more at Financial Times 

Sir James Goldsmith talks about outsourcing to China

Twenty years ago, Sir James Goldsmith talks about how America will kill its own economy. It is quite horrifying hearing Goldsmith accurately predict today's situation as Clinton's trade agreement GATT gets implemented and the long term consequences unfold. Goldsmith talks about how jobs will get obliterated as they are exported from America and the number of jobs reduced sharply.
Goldsmith asks,"What is the purpose of an economy?" He says it is there to serve the needs of society - prosperity and stability. He adds, "Material wealth would solve our problems and we achieved that. We have destabilized society because the economy is no longer serving us."
"Who benefits from these trade treaties? Major corporations benefit. What is good for GM is good for the USA is no longer true. They are no longer linked to the USA. They farm out their production wherever they can get the cheapest capital and labour."
Charlie Rose is stunned at the suggestion that automobile manufacturing or technology industries would move out of America. I would enjoy Charlie Rose doing a "Stupid Things I Said in the Past 20 Years on my Show." This show is almost painful to watch as a wise entrepreneur who can see the patterns of industry tries to get across his correct vision of the outsourcing of American jobs. Clinton's spokesperson does not listen and just shouts him down. She ran the London School of Economics and boy, if this is the type of "thought leader" leading our universities, the type that refuses to listen but shouts down the opponent, it is not a good trend.
Clinton's aid says. "When American jobs are moved abroad, they add jobs here too."
Goldsmith points out that new jobs are part time and lower skilled. This was back in 1992. We have seen that real income has not risen since 1992. Goldsmith saw the future, here is the interview:

Enjoy your holidays and Happy New Year

Needed Words for Your Strategy

I make every effort to read new business strategy books and articles. In 90 percent of cases, I can dismiss neither the author's thought process nor his or her evidence—but I am always taken aback by the abundance of "clever" and the absence of any discussion or consideration of the ability to implement the suggestions made or implied. There is total silence around the subject. For example, I did a quick analysis of the Index of one "famous" strategy tome circa 2007—words like "people" and "customer" and "leadership" and "implementation" and "execution" were literally missing.

How Deming would have loved Private Equity

Private equity fulfills one of Deming's key ideas - that profound knowledge generally comes from outside the system, or the business, and is only useful if it is invited and received with an eagerness to learn and improve. 
When private equity is invited into a business, the owner-operators are ready to hear suggestions on how to improve. New comments by the Private Equity team will be anticipated and absorbed. This power to influence is one of PE's main differentiators from the public market financing where faceless investors have little impact on strategy or operational priorities.
Deming believed that a system (business) cannot understand itself without help from outside the system, because prior experiences will bias objectivity, preventing critical analysis of the organization. Critical self-examination is difficult without impartial analysis from outside the organization. Also, insiders can rarely serve as hostile critics who speak frankly without fear of reprisals.
According to Deming, the journey from the prevailing management style to quality requires the understanding of systems. A system is composed of interrelated components. Quality is the optimization of performance of the components relative to the goal or aim of the system. Individual components of the system will reinforce, not compete with each of the other components of the system to accomplish the aim of the system.
Surprisingly, a lack of clearly defined purpose is common in U.S. organizations, particularly long-range purpose. Short-term thinking, quarterly and annual performance evaluations, and bottom line thinking forces attention to quick-fix solutions. Even if long-range plans exist, prevailing short-term thinking distracts from long-term behavior toward real solutions.
Quality is a systematic process: 

1. First, establish the aim: vision, mission, goals or constancy of purpose of the
2. system. According to Deming, without aim, there is no system (Identity).
3. Identify the components
4. Map the processes 
5. Examine the interrelationships of the components within the system (relationships).
6. Constantly improve on the processes of the system (Information/Learning/Knowledge.)